Goals and Principles for Judicial Nominating Commissions
A subcommittee of the O’Connor Judicial Selection Advisory Committee developed a set of goals to pursue and principles to follow in the selection, composition, and operation of judicial nominating commissions.
Judicial Appointments by State Governors
Appointment by the governor is an element of the O’Connor Judicial Selection Plan. In the 23 states and D.C. that always use the O'Connor Plan to choose at least some judges, the governor makes the appointment from the list of candidates submitted by the judicial nominating commission, and in 10 states with contested elections, this process is used to fill vacancies between elections. In 5 states, the governor always appoints judges of at least some courts at his or her own discretion, without input from a judicial nominating commission, and in 17 elective states, this process is used to fill vacancies between elections or legislative sessions.
Judicial Retention Elections in the States
Retention elections are an element of the O’Connor Judicial Selection Plan. They are used in 15 O’Connor Plan states for judges who are seeking additional terms. Retention elections are also used in 3 states where judges are first chosen in partisan elections and in two states where the governor appoints judges.
Federal Judicial Screening Committees
Federal judicial screening committees are used by senators (and a few House members) in 21 of the 50 states and in the District of Columbia to vet would-be federal district judges whom they might recommend to the White House.
National Conference on Evaluating Appellate Judges
Preserving Integrity, Maintaining Accountability • December 1, 2011
This post-conference report discusses the various approaches currently in place for evaluating appellate judges and justices, and identifies themes, recommendations, and areas for future work in appellate judicial performance evaluation.