Skip to main content
University of Denver
Home
IAALS

Site Search

  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Our Team
    • Board & Partners
    • Events
    • Research
    • Media
    • Annual Reports
    • IAALS Awards
    • Careers
  • Our Work
    • Projects
    • Publications
    • Expert Opinions
    • Convenings
    • Impact
  • Blog
  • Connect
$
More ways to give

Selection Snapshots

Senate Showing Signs of Life on Judicial Nominations
Senate Showing Signs of Life on Judicial Nominations
During the week of December 3, the U.S. Senate confirmed four nominees for district court judgeships in Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, and Michigan. This is unexpected progress in light of disagreement among Republican senators over whether to take any action in this arena during the lame-duck session.
Continue Reading
Requirement for Partisan Balance on Delaware Courts Leads to Reform Proposal
Requirement for Partisan Balance on Delaware Courts Leads to Reform Proposal
Senate Republicans are questioning whether some recent court appointees changed their party affiliation so that they would be eligible for appointment, and they have proposed a constitutional amendment that would require judicial applicants to have held their party affiliation for at least two years.
Continue Reading
Louisiana Supreme Court Candidate Goes on the Offensive
Louisiana Supreme Court Candidate Goes on the Offensive
The campaign for a seat on Louisiana’s supreme court has taken a negative turn, with the Democratic candidate sponsoring an ad attacking Republican Jeff Hughes’ record as a trial court judge.
Continue Reading
School Funding Decision Could Intensify Efforts to Alter Selection of Kansas Judges
School Funding Decision Could Intensify Efforts to Alter Selection of Kansas Judges
As IAALS Online has covered previously, Governor Brownback and conservative state legislators are expected to pursue changes to the process for choosing Kansas’ appellate judges in the upcoming legislative session. An unfavorable judicial decision in a school funding case could lend momentum to those efforts.
Continue Reading
Contentious Supreme Court Election Anticipated in Wisconsin
Contentious Supreme Court Election Anticipated in Wisconsin
A contentious and likely expensive supreme court campaign is expected in April 2013, with Justice Patience Roggensack seeking reelection and at least three candidates expressing interest in challenging her. The outcome of the race has the potential to alter the ideological balance on the seven-mamber court, as Justice Roggensack is part of the court’s four-member conservative majority.
Continue Reading
New Judgeships Shine Spotlight on South Carolina's Judicial Selection Process
New Judgeships Shine Spotlight on South Carolina's Judicial Selection Process
When they return in January, South Carolina legislators will elect judges for nine new circuit and family court judgeships, providing critics of this selection process with an opportunity to press their case. Their concerns center on the judicial merit selection commission, a ten-member body appointed by legislative leaders—and including six legislators—that screens and recommends judicial candidates.
Continue Reading
Implementation of Merit Selection in Pinal County Hits a Snag
Implementation of Merit Selection in Pinal County Hits a Snag
According to a 1974 amendment to Arizona’s constitution, counties with a population of at least 250,000 must select their superior court judges via commission-based gubernatorial appointment—a.k.a. merit selection—rather than in contested elections. Pinal County exceeded that population threshold in the 2010 census, but the transition to merit selection has not been a smooth one.
Continue Reading
D.C. Bar Commences Annual Judicial Survey
D.C. Bar Commences Annual Judicial Survey
The D.C. Bar Judicial Evaluations Committee is beginning its annual survey of attorneys about judges sitting on the D.C. Court of Appeals and D.C. Superior Court. The results of the evaluations are given to the evaluated judge and the chief judge of his/her court.
Continue Reading
California High Court Amends Rules Regarding Judicial Elections
California High Court Amends Rules Regarding Judicial Elections
In the wake of the November elections, the California Supreme Court adopted amendments to the code of judicial ethics that address judicial campaigns. The new rules require appellate judges, who stand for retention every twelve years, to recuse themselves from hearing cases involving parties who have made campaign contributions of at least $5000.
Continue Reading
Utah Judicial Performance Evaluation Results Not Seen by Many Citizens
Utah Judicial Performance Evaluation Results Not Seen by Many Citizens
Judicial performance evaluation results published by the new Utah Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission (JPEC) were not seen by many Utah citizens, the JPEC reports. For the first time, the Lieutenant Governor’s Office did not send the voter information pamphlet to all registered voters.
Continue Reading

Pagination

  • Previous page ‹‹
  • Page 12
  • Next page ››

Do you share our vision of a world where everyone has a clear path to justice? Help us make justice for all a reality for all by making a gift today.

Donate Now

Home

2060 South Gaylord Way
John Moye Hall
Denver, CO 80208
303-871-6600
iaals@du.edu

Footer menu

  • About
  • Media
  • Blog
  • Connect
  • Careers
  • Donate
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact

Subscribe

Sign up to get the latest updates

You're almost there, just verify your email and then click the submit button below.

Social media

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • University of Denver
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies

© 2025 University of Denver. All rights reserved. The University of Denver is an equal opportunity affirmative action institution.