In-House Counsel: Law Schools Must Play Key Role in Training Practice-Ready Lawyers
The online legal community was abuzz Monday with the news that corporate clients don’t want to foot the bill for new lawyer training thanks to a Wall Street Journal article that asks: “First-Year Associates: Are They Worth It?”
Of course, we’ve all heard this before, but at least one statistic the Wall Street Journal brings to light will likely capture the attention of managing partners around the country: “more than 20% of the 366 in-house legal departments that responded are refusing to pay for the work of first- or second-year attorneys, in at least some matters.”
And the results aren’t isolated—the Wall Street Journal says this approach is a growing trend. We think it’s a trend law schools should be paying attention to. After all, as Elie Mystal of Above the Law asked in his response to the article, “If law schools aren’t pumping out people who can convince clients to pay for their work, then what are law schools doing really?”
We’ve been talking to in-house counsel for months about gaps in legal education and the skills they would like law schools to develop in their students.
In a recent interview , Annita Menogan, who serves as Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer of Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, said companies don’t want to pay $165 per hour for a new lawyer who doesn’t know anything but they would not be opposed to paying for a new lawyer who offered real value to a case.