Non-ALJ Adjudicators in Federal Agencies

Status, Selection, Oversight, and Removal

This report to the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) describes a large but relatively unknown group of executive branch adjudicators who are not “Administrative Law Judges” (ALJs) governed by the Administrative Procedure Act. Like ALJs, these “Non-ALJs” preside over—or hear appeals from—adjudications in which one of the parties can obtain an oral hearing to present evidence (even if parties rarely request hearings). The difference is that the APA does not govern their appointment, tenure, and employment conditions.

ACUS commissioned this report to obtain data and provide recommendations concerning non-ALJs’ appointment, independence, and oversight, especially as contrasted with ALJs’.

 

How can we help? Consulting Inquiries: iaals@du.edu

Publication date and authors

  • Image of Kent Barnett

    Kent Barnett

    • J. Alton Hosch Associate Professor of Law, University of Georgia School of Law
  • Image of Malia Reddick

    Malia Reddick

    • Former Manager, Quality Judges Initiative
  • Image of Russell Wheeler

    Russell Wheeler

    • President, Governance Institute
    • Visiting Fellow, The Brookings Institution
    • Former Deputy Director, Federal Judicial Center
    • Senior Fellow, IAALS