Skip to main content
University of Denver
Home
IAALS

Site Search

  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Our Team
    • Board & Partners
    • Events
    • Research
    • Media
    • Annual Reports
    • IAALS Awards
    • Job Openings
  • Our Work
    • Projects
    • Publications
    • Expert Opinions
    • Convenings
    • Impact
  • Blog
  • Connect
  • Donate

Selection Snapshots

New Study: Partisan Judicial Elections Lead to Poorer Quality Courts
New Study: Partisan Judicial Elections Lead to Poorer Quality Courts
According to a recent study, Alabama should move from partisan elections of judges to commission-based gubernatorial appointment in order to ensure a stable, predictable, and fair legal system for businesses and promote long-term economic growth. The study explores the correlation between states' methods for selecting judges and how attorneys perceive judges' competence and impartiality, as well as other aspects of states' legal environments.
Continue Reading
2014 Governor Races to Impact State Courts
2014 Governor Races to Impact State Courts
The outcome of governors' races in at least two states—Florida and Kansas—will have meaningful implications for those states' courts. Florida's next governor could have the opportunity to fill four of seven seats on the supreme court. In Kansas, the gubernatorial candidates have a fundamental area of disagreement involving how state supreme court justices should be chosen.
Continue Reading
Attention in Tennessee—and Around the Country—Turns to Court-Related Ballot Measures
Attention in Tennessee—and Around the Country—Turns to Court-Related Ballot Measures
On August 7, three Tennessee Supreme Court justices withstood a well-funded challenge to their retention on the bench for subsequent terms. Tennesseans are now looking ahead to November 4, when voters will decide whether to adopt a modified federal selection process for the state's appellate judges. Voters in four other states will also weigh in on proposed constitutional amendments affecting judicial selection and tenure.
Continue Reading
New Mexico's Hybrid Judicial Selection Process Comes Under Scrutiny
New Mexico's Hybrid Judicial Selection Process Comes Under Scrutiny
New Mexico judges are chosen through a process that is truly unique. Since 1988, judicial vacancies have been filled by commission-based appointment. Appointees then face a partisan election to keep their seats. At the conclusion of their terms, judges stand for retention for subsequent terms. This year, five judges waited until after the filing deadline to announce their retirement, exemplifying what some see as an increasing trend by judges and party leaders to try to influence judicial selections.
Continue Reading
Calls Increase for an End to Judicial Elections in Arkansas
Calls Increase for an End to Judicial Elections in Arkansas
Recent events in Arkansas have prompted some state leaders to call for an end to electing judges, in favor of commission-based gubernatorial appointment.
Continue Reading
Pace of Pro- and Anti-Retention Ads Picks Up in Tennessee
Pace of Pro- and Anti-Retention Ads Picks Up in Tennessee
With Tennessee's August 7 judicial retention elections just over two weeks away, the TV ad war is escalating. According to the latest figures, the Tennessee Forum has spent nearly $120,000 on an anti-retention TV ad, while campaigns supporting the justices' retention have spent just over $200,000 on television advertising.
Continue Reading
Colorado Supreme Court Ends Effort to Allow Recall of Judges, but Similar Proposals on the Table in Other States
Colorado Supreme Court Ends Effort to Allow Recall of Judges, but Similar Proposals on the Table in Other States
The Colorado Supreme Court has rejected a proposed initiative intended for the November 2014 ballot that would amend the state constitution to allow voter recall of judges. Two other proposed ballot initiatives aimed at courts and judges are still alive. Eight states currently allow voters to recall judges.
Continue Reading
Federal Judge Okays Ohio's Unusual System for Electing Judges
Federal Judge Okays Ohio's Unusual System for Electing Judges
A federal judge has upheld the unusual system that Ohio uses to elect its judges, which features partisan primary elections and a nonpartisan general election. The challenge to the Ohio system was first filed in 2010 by the Ohio Democratic Party, three judicial candidates, and a public employees union, who claimed that not allowing judicial candidates to run with party labels violated their First Amendment rights.
Continue Reading
In a Deal with Democrats, Governor Christie Re-Nominates State's Chief Justice
In a Deal with Democrats, Governor Christie Re-Nominates State's Chief Justice
Ending months of speculation, Governor Chris Christie re-nominated Chief Justice Stuart Rabner to the New Jersey Supreme Court. The move was part of a political compromise with senate leadership, which agreed in exchange to support the nomination of a Christie ally to the supreme court. The deal between Governor Christie, a Republican, and Democrats in the senate will fill one of two seats on a court that has had two vacancies since early 2012.
Continue Reading
Tennessee Justices Launch Retention Campaign with Bar Support
Tennessee Justices Launch Retention Campaign with Bar Support
As the burgeoning campaign in opposition to the retention of the three Tennessee justices continues, those justices are responding with their own campaign. They recently gave an interview to a local news outlet in which they discussed the threat that the retention challenge poses to judicial independence. The Tennessee and Nashville bar associations have both entered the fray as well.
Continue Reading

Pagination

  • Previous page ‹‹
  • Page 2
  • Next page ››

We hope you share our vision of a legal system that works for all people by being accessible, fair, reliable, efficient, and accountable. Please join the effort by making a gift today.

Donate Now
Home
2060 South Gaylord Way
John Moye Hall
Denver CO , 80208
(303) 871-6600
iaals@du.edu

Footer menu

  • About
  • Media
  • Blog
  • Connect
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact

Subscribe

Sign up to get the latest updates

You're almost there, just verify your email and then click the submit button below.

Social media

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • University of Denver
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies

© 2023 University of Denver. All rights reserved. The University of Denver is an equal opportunity affirmative action institution.